[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Ways to make org feasible for huge files
From: |
Jude DaShiell |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Ways to make org feasible for huge files |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Oct 2011 05:54:13 -0400 (EDT) |
Why not working-file and archive-file? Archive-file would be the big
file and working-file would be the small file in that scheme.
On Wed, 12 Oct 2011, brian powell wrote:
> * Maybe EMACS "narrowing" could be used:
> http://www.gnu.org/s/libtool/manual/emacs/Narrowing.html
> ...
> Narrowing can make it easier to concentrate on a single subroutine or
> paragraph by eliminating clutter. It can also be used to limit the
> range of operation of a replace command or repeating keyboard macro.
> ...
> C-x n n
> Narrow down to between point and mark (narrow-to-region).
> C-x n w
> Widen to make the entire buffer accessible again (widen).
> C-x n p
> Narrow down to the current page (narrow-to-page).
> C-x n d
> Narrow down to the current defun (narrow-to-defun).
>
> ** I mean: Maybe an OrgMode user could do narrow-to-region (and then
> just "render" on the new smaller region) and/or an implementation
> something like "org-narrow-to-region" could be coded.
>
> *** Just an idea--your mileage may vary--it may not work at all--I
> hope you try it out and tell how it works for you.
>
> * I ran into similar problems: I made the file into 2 separate
> files--one very large and the other very small that I render a
> lot--when it gets big, I just prune out older and less important now
> (backburner) subjects, paste them at the bottom of the small file and
> then cut and paste the less important "*" sections into the big file.
> ** Works great, its really the best way to do it--for backing up and
> encrypting reasons and hard drive space reasons etc.
> ** Could call them blahfile_now.org and blahfile_later.org (for the
> small and large files respectively).
> *** Since OrgMode files are plain text files, this works great.
>
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I love org and I think there's nothing like it out there, but I'm
> > considering using Evernote for reference notes, because my reference.org
> > file has grown too big (4234k + lines). This makes the rendering of the file
> > way too slow, and 2 times out of 10 emacs crashes because of that.
>
>
Jude <address@hidden>
If I got a nickel for every message I've already sent supporting Microsoft
Windows and its applications I'd have enough to retire on comfortably no
matter what the stock market did.
- [O] Ways to make org feasible for huge files, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa, 2011/10/12
- Re: [O] Ways to make org feasible for huge files, brian powell, 2011/10/12
- Re: [O] Ways to make org feasible for huge files, Torsten Wagner, 2011/10/12
- Re: [O] Ways to make org feasible for huge files, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa, 2011/10/12
- Re: [O] Ways to make org feasible for huge files, Tassilo Horn, 2011/10/13
- Re: [O] Ways to make org feasible for huge files, Marcelo de Moraes Serpa, 2011/10/13
- Re: [O] Ways to make org feasible for huge files, Scott Jaderholm, 2011/10/14
- Re: [O] Ways to make org feasible for huge files, Tassilo Horn, 2011/10/14
- Re: [O] Ways to make org feasible for huge files, Scott Jaderholm, 2011/10/14
- Re: [O] Ways to make org feasible for huge files, Jude DaShiell, 2011/10/14
[O] GNU Emacs crashing on large Orgmode files (was: Ways to make org feasible for huge files), Karl Voit, 2011/10/13