[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] [babel] BUG in :session
From: |
Sebastien Vauban |
Subject: |
Re: [O] [babel] BUG in :session |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:59:25 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt) |
Hi Eric,
Eric Schulte wrote:
> "Sebastien Vauban" <address@hidden> writes:
>> Martyn Jago wrote:
>>> "Sebastien Vauban"
>>> <address@hidden> writes:
>>>> Loading /cygdrive/c/home/sva/src/org-mode/testing/lisp/test-ob-R.el
>>>> (source)...
>>>> peculiar error
>>
>> Just git pull'ed, and re-tested:
>>
>> ┏━━━━
>> ┃ Ran 111 tests, 104 results as expected, 7 unexpected (2011-09-26
>> 08:20:06+0200)
>> ┃
>> ┃ 7 unexpected results:
>> ┃ FAILED ob-fortran/command-arguments
>> ┃ FAILED ob-fortran/fortran-var-program
>> ┃ FAILED ob-fortran/input-var
>> ┃ FAILED ob-fortran/list-var
>> ┃ FAILED ob-fortran/list-var-from-table
>> ┃ FAILED ob-fortran/preprosessor-var
>> ┃ FAILED ob-fortran/simple-program
>> ┗━━━━
>>
>> "Normal", I don't have any fortran installed. Maybe, some sort of protection
>> should have to be applied to these too.
>
> I've just improved the code which checks for executables as the previous
> version was probably linux-specific. The following should now throw an
> error on your system which should inhibit loading of the fortran tests.
>
> (org-test-for-executable "gfortran")
New status:
┏━━━━
┃ Ran 102 tests, 102 results as expected (2011-09-26 15:54:14+0200)
┗━━━━
Perfect...
>>>> This is on Windows XP SP3, with a Cygwin Emacs (when run from terminal;
>>>> otherwise, it is a Win32 binary from the FSF).
>>>
>>> Its really great to hear you are running the tests on Windows. At some
>>> point I hope to test with the EmacsW32 port.
>>
>> I can do it as well. I should automate this -- not difficult, though.
>>
>> If there is some shared place to place such results, I can imagine running
>> them every couple of hours (cron'ed), or so, and publish the resulting HTML.
>> I
>> could do this when being online, that is more or less half of the time.
>
> This sounds great. I agree that a public place to post results would be
> useful. Also, while we don't have any HTML export right now, simply
> redirecting the results of the test execution to a file should be
> sufficient.
We can put such in place. For Windows tests, it could be someone else, if
someone promises to be 24/7 online -- what won't be my case. Otherwise, I'm
willing to do it, simply know that there will be holes in the update of the
results.
Best regards,
Seb
--
Sebastien Vauban
- Re: [O] [babel] BUG in :session, (continued)
- Re: [O] [babel] BUG in :session, Martyn Jago, 2011/09/21
- Re: [O] [babel] BUG in :session, Eric Schulte, 2011/09/21
- Re: [O] [babel] BUG in :session, Martyn Jago, 2011/09/23
- Re: [O] [babel] BUG in :session, Eric Schulte, 2011/09/23
- Re: [O] [babel] BUG in :session, Martyn Jago, 2011/09/23
- Re: [O] [babel] BUG in :session, Sebastien Vauban, 2011/09/23
- Re: [O] [babel] BUG in :session, Eric Schulte, 2011/09/24
- Re: [O] [babel] BUG in :session, Martyn Jago, 2011/09/25
- Re: [O] [babel] BUG in :session, Sebastien Vauban, 2011/09/26
- Re: [O] [babel] BUG in :session, Eric Schulte, 2011/09/26
- Re: [O] [babel] BUG in :session,
Sebastien Vauban <=
- Re: [O] [babel] BUG in :session, Eric Schulte, 2011/09/24
- Re: [O] [babel] BUG in :session, Martyn Jago, 2011/09/25
Re: [O] [babel] BUG in :session, Rainer M Krug, 2011/09/21