Re: [O] Bug: org-time-stamp loses repeater interval

[Karl Voit]

* Bastien <address@hidden> wrote:
> Karl Voit <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> The warning period still gets deleted though :-(
>
> You're right, should be fixed now.

Sorry when I disagree for one case:

When I change each entry in my test data using «C-c .» and clicking
on 1st of July ...

,----[ test data ]
| <2011-06-28 Tue>
| <2011-06-28 Tue +1w>
| <2011-06-28 Tue -1d>
| <2011-06-28 Tue +1w -1d>
`----

... I end up having this:

,----[ result ]
| <2011-07-01 Fri>
| <2011-07-01 Fri +1w>
| <2011-07-01 Fri -1d>
| <2011-07-01 Fri -1d>
`----

In the last case, the repeater gets lost :-(

-- 
Karl Voit

Hallo, mein Name ist Web 2.0. Gib mir dein Adressbuch und lass mich Emails lesen