Re: [O] org-time-stamp loses repeater interval

[Bernt Hansen]

Karl Voit <address@hidden> writes:

> Hi!
>
> Maybe there is a (to me at least hidden) feature behind the behavior
> that org-time-stamp (C-c .) deletes any repeater information when
> used to update a date stamp.
>
> Or is this some kind of bug or at least unexpected behavior?

There was a report of that recently for malformed timestamps.  Do you
have an example of one that loses the repeater when you reschedule it?

-- 
Bernt