[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[O] [babel] using #+call for inline results
From: |
Eric S Fraga |
Subject: |
[O] [babel] using #+call for inline results |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:07:57 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
I have been playing with org babel for putting results inline within an
exported latex file. A simple example is here:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* testing inline evaluation of babel source blocks
#+srcname: benzene-chlorobenzene-relative-volatility
#+begin_src octave :exports none :results output raw :var T=25
format bank
pb = 10^(6.89272 - 1203.531/(T+219.888));
pc = 10^(7.10690 - 1500.0 /(T+224.000));
alpha = pb/pc;
disp(alpha)
#+end_src
1. The first step is to evaluate the relative volatility at \(T=25 ^{\circ}
C\):
#+call: benzene-chlorobenzene-relative-volatility[:results output
raw](T=25) :exports results
2. Compare this to the value we get at 50 \(^{\circ}C\):
#+call: benzene-chlorobenzene-relative-volatility(T=50) :exports results
3. Next we use this value to draw an equilibrium curve.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
If I evaluate the code block, I get what I expect:
,----
| #+results: benzene-chlorobenzene-relative-volatility
| 7.86
`----
However, when I export the file, the #+call lines get wrapped in a
verbatim environment regardless of what or where I specify for
the :results header arguments. E.g.:
,----
| \begin{enumerate}
| \item The first step is to evaluate the relative volatility at \(T=25
^{\circ} C\):
|
|
| \begin{verbatim}
| 7.86
| \end{verbatim}
|
| \item Compare this to the value we get at 50 \(^{\circ}C\):
|
|
| \begin{verbatim}
| 6.32
| \end{verbatim}
`----
What am I doing wrong? I have tried various permutations of the
placement of the :results header and various options for it but do not
seem to have hit on the right combination.
Ideally, I would like the number to appear completely inline with the
text the precedes and follows the #+call statement. I would prefer to
not have a new paragraph started, for instance.
On a related note, although the manual seems to indicate that "raw" and
"org" are synonymous, they behave differently when evaluating a code
block with the latter encapsulating the output within #+begin_org
and #+end_org. The behaviour is fine but maybe the documentation,
assuming I have understand things correctly, should be changed to
reflect the difference in behaviour?
Thanks,
eric
--
: Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.50.1
: using Org-mode version 7.5 (release_7.5.418.ge860.dirty)
- [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results,
Eric S Fraga <=
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/22
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric S Fraga, 2011/06/22
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric Schulte, 2011/06/23
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric S Fraga, 2011/06/23
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Nicolas Goaziou, 2011/06/23
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, chris . m . malone, 2011/06/23
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric S Fraga, 2011/06/23
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Nicolas Goaziou, 2011/06/23
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Eric S Fraga, 2011/06/24
- Re: [O] [babel] using #+call for inline results, Christian Moe, 2011/06/23