[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Bug in latex export tutorial on worg ?
From: |
Thomas S. Dye |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Bug in latex export tutorial on worg ? |
Date: |
Tue, 10 May 2011 06:01:43 -1000 |
Robert Goldman <address@hidden> writes:
> On 5/10/11 May 10 -12:25 AM, Thomas S. Dye wrote:
>> Robert Goldman <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> On 5/9/11 May 9 -11:22 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
>>>> Robert Goldman <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 5/9/11 May 9 -9:54 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
>>>>>> Robert Goldman <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is the following code block there:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> #+begin_src emacs-lisp :results silent
>>>>>>> (add-to-list 'org-export-latex-classes
>>>>>>> '("per-file-class"
>>>>>>> "\\documentclass{scrartcl}
>>>>>>> [NO-DEFAULT-PACKAGES]
>>>>>>> [EXTRA]"
>>>>>>> ("\\section{%s}" . "\\section*{%s}")
>>>>>>> ("\\subsection{%s}" . "\\subsection*{%s}")
>>>>>>> ("\\subsubsection{%s}" . "\\subsubsection*{%s}")
>>>>>>> ("\\paragraph{%s}" . "\\paragraph*{%s}")
>>>>>>> ("\\subparagraph{%s}" . "\\subparagraph*{%s}")))
>>>>>>> #+end_src
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this still correct? Or should this be :exports none instead of
>>>>>>> :results silent?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ``:results silent'' works for me and keeps the result from appearing in
>>>>>> the org buffer. I don't think :exports can do that - it can only affect
>>>>>> what's exported.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Nick
>>>>>
>>>>> I must be doing something wrong then --- I had the :results silent and
>>>>> found the source block in verbatim in my latex export file.... Changing
>>>>> to :exports none made that go away for me. Maybe that was a
>>>>> coincidence. I will have to investigate further, I guess.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No, you are not doing anything wrong: the default :exports value is
>>>> "code", so the code ends up in your export. ``:exports none'' keeps it
>>>> (and any results) from being exported.
>>>>
>>>> OTOH, try evaluating (C-c C-c) the code block, with and without
>>>> ``:results silent''. There is a behavior difference and *that* difference
>>>> is not affected by how you set :exports.
>>>>
>>>> Nick
>>>
>>> Ah. I get it now. But then surely the above IS a bug -- presumably
>>> it's not usual for a person to wish their latex export configuration to
>>> appear, in verbatim block, in their org-generated latex document!
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Robert
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Aloha Robert,
>>
>> I've added :exports none to the example, which came from a document
>> about how to export LaTeX documents from Org-mode. Thanks for pointing
>> out that it could be used in a way that yields unexpected results.
>>
>> In my usual setup I put this kind of configuration in a heading of its
>> own that is protected by a :noexport: tag. This works for me because I
>> often have notes about why things are in there and what I think they
>> might be doing.
>
> Great! Thanks. Your tutorial has been very helpful to me. I needed to
> figure out how to set up a special-purpose format for my document and in
> a moment I had just the solution I needed.
>
> I suppose one could do...
>
> (unless (find "per-file-class" org-export-latex-classes :key 'car
> :test 'equal)
> (add-to-list 'org-export-latex-classes
> '("per-file-class"
> "\\documentclass{scrartcl}
> [NO-DEFAULT-PACKAGES]
> [EXTRA]"
> ("\\section{%s}" . "\\section*{%s}")
> ("\\subsection{%s}" . "\\subsection*{%s}")
> ("\\subsubsection{%s}" . "\\subsubsection*{%s}")
> ("\\paragraph{%s}" . "\\paragraph*{%s}")
> ("\\subparagraph{%s}" . "\\subparagraph*{%s}"))))
>
> since the add-to-list is a globally side-effecting action; it doesn't
> need to be repeated on each export, right? [I thought at first pushnew
> could do the job, but now I don't think so.]
>
> Best,
> R
>
Aloha Robert,
Many thanks for this improvement to the example code. I've added it to
the tutorial (and to my own bits of setup code).
All the best,
Tom
--
T.S. Dye & Colleagues, Archaeologists
735 Bishop St, Suite 315, Honolulu, HI 96813
Tel: 808-529-0866, Fax: 808-529-0884
http://www.tsdye.com
- Re: [O] Bug in latex export tutorial on worg ?, (continued)
- Re: [O] Bug in latex export tutorial on worg ?, Nick Dokos, 2011/05/09
- Re: [O] Bug in latex export tutorial on worg ?, Robert Goldman, 2011/05/09
- Re: [O] Bug in latex export tutorial on worg ?, Thomas S. Dye, 2011/05/09
- Re: [O] Bug in latex export tutorial on worg ?, Nick Dokos, 2011/05/10
- Re: [O] Bug in latex export tutorial on worg ?, Robert Goldman, 2011/05/10
- Re: [O] Bug in latex export tutorial on worg ?, Nick Dokos, 2011/05/10
- Re: [O] Bug in latex export tutorial on worg ?, Nick Dokos, 2011/05/10
- Re: [O] Bug in latex export tutorial on worg ?, Thomas S. Dye, 2011/05/10
- Re: [O] Bug in latex export tutorial on worg ?, Thomas S. Dye, 2011/05/10
- Re: [O] Bug in latex export tutorial on worg ?, Robert Goldman, 2011/05/10
- Re: [O] Bug in latex export tutorial on worg ?,
Thomas S. Dye <=