emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [O] [BUG] ORG-LIST-END-MARKER within table.el table


From: Jambunathan K
Subject: Re: [O] [BUG] ORG-LIST-END-MARKER within table.el table
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 00:57:05 +0530
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (windows-nt)

Hello Nicolas

> Hello,
>
> Jambunathan K <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Export the following fragment to html
>>
>> * Another Table.el Table with Spanning
>>   
>>   +----------+----------+
>>   | Header 1 | Header 2 |
>>   +----------+----------+
>>   | R1 C1-2             |
>>   +----------+----------+
>>   | R2 C1    | R2-3 C2  |
>>   +          +----------+
>>   |          |          |
>>   +----------+----------+
>>
>>
>> Examine the temporary buffer that is emitted by
>> `org-export-preprocess-string'. Note that there is a ORG-LIST-END-MARKER
>> within the table.el table.
>>
>>
>> *  Another Table.el Table with Spanning 
>>   
>>   +----------+----------+
>>   | Header 1 | Header 2 |
>>   +----------+----------+
>>   | R1 C1-2             |
>>   +----------+----------+
>>   | R2 C1    | R2-3 C2  |
>>   +          +----------+
>> ORG-LIST-END-MARKER
>>   +----------+----------+
>
> This is because
>
>                         +          +----------+
>
> is recognized as a list item.
>
> But this case shouldn't happen. If you span "R2 C1" cell vertically, you
> get
>
>                         +----------+----------+
>                         | Header 1 | Header 2 |
>                         +----------+----------+
>                         | R1 C1-2             |
>                         +----------+----------+
>                         | R2 C1    | R2-3 C2  |
>                         |          +----------+
>                         |          |          |
>                         +----------+----------+
>                                     
> instead, which is correct. Did you edit table by hand?

It does look like I might have polluted a table.el table. (The table I
presented has been with me for a few months now and I don't really
recollect how I created it in the first place)

I think I need to "fix" the buggy test case. Thanks a lot for pointing
this out.

Jambunathan K.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]