[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Feature request [7.3]
From: |
Dave Abrahams |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Feature request [7.3] |
Date: |
Thu, 09 Dec 2010 05:42:53 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.9 (Gojō) APEL/10.8 Emacs/23.2 (x86_64-apple-darwin) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
At Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:57:54 +0000,
Eric S Fraga wrote:
>
> Dave Abrahams <address@hidden> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> >> > It'd be great if there were a way to make the ID property
> >> > read-only (or really really hard to change).
> >>
> >> This is where column mode comes in quite handy?
> >
> > Link please?
>
> Apologies; I meant column view within org mode: info -> org ->
> Properties and Columns -> Column view
Wow, having that on completely messes up the agenda view!
> [...]
>
> > But the point is that these are just examples. I think Org wasn't
> > designed with the idea that it would end up having much of a
> > "grammar," but it grew one. I'm arguing for a UI re-think for the
> > tool Org has become.
>
> Yes, I can see what you are getting at. However, one of the nicest
> things about org is that it doesn't necessarily impose a structure on
> everything and so a formal grammar could get in the way.
I'm not asking to change the grammar, I'm just asking the editor to be
smarter about the grammar that has actually evolved.
> One could argue that the flexibility of the system is it's main
> source of effectiveness!
Could, but total flexibility doesn't work for everyone.
> That and the fact that it is based on pure
> text. However, this doesn't argue against improvements in the user
> interface when necessary!
...or even "when possible?"
--
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com