Carsten Dominik wrote:
Due to changes made to lists, it is no longer possible to have a
sublist,
some text and then another sublist while still in the same top-
level list
item, like in the following situation:
- Some list
+ A first sublist
+ of two elements
A text belonging to the top-level list
+ Then another sublist
+ and a second element in it
- End of main list
Basically, it means that this entry for this entry (about Org
Babel) from
an old file of mine (update this morning) does not publish anymore
the same
way:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* How to view the results
- =C-c C-v C-v= (or =C-c C-v v=) -- View the expanded body of a
code block.
- =C-c C-v C-z= -- Switch to the *session* of the current code
block (first,
you need to add =:session= to it).
Use =C-u C-c C-v C-z= to bring up the session with the input
variable
pre-loaded.
=C-c C-v z= (=org-babel-switch-to-session-with-code=) is a variant
of =C-c
C-v C-z= (=org-babel-switch-to-session=): instead of switching to
the
session buffer, it splits the window between:
+ the session buffer, and
+ a language major-mode edit buffer for the code block in question.
This can be convenient for using language major mode for
interacting with
the session buffer.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
The last sentence is *not* considered part of the second element
of the
first list.
Although I've seen similar constructs in many, many documents,
does anyone
know enough rules of style to tell me if this is a wrong way to
write
things down? Or, does some possibility still exist to support this
seamlessly?