[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Orgmode] Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7
From: |
Matt Lundin |
Subject: |
[Orgmode] Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans] |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Sep 2010 08:05:23 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Andrew J. Korty" <address@hidden> writes:
> Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
> what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
>
> http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
>
> Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> If I have multiple timestamps in a TODO item, org-auto-repeat-maybe
> only advances the first one. In the following example, I'd like both
> the SCHEDULED and DEADLINE timestamps to advance when the item is
> marked DONE, but only the SCHEDULED timestamp advances.
>
> * TODO do something by Sunday but not until Friday
> SCHEDULED: <2010-09-17 Fri ++1w> DEADLINE: <2010-09-19 Sun ++1w>
I can confirm this bug, although AFAICT it occurs only when both the
SCHEDULED and DEADLINE repeating syntax are of the "++" variety.
E.g.,
The example above results in:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* TODO do something by Sunday but not until Friday
SCHEDULED: <2010-09-24 Fri ++1w> DEADLINE: <2010-09-19 Sun ++1w>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
However, if the scheduled timestamp is not a "double plus" (++), then
the timestamps advance as expected:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* TODO Another example
SCHEDULED: <2010-09-17 Fri +1w> DEADLINE: <2010-09-19 Sun ++1w>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
becomes...
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* TODO Another example
SCHEDULED: <2010-09-24 Fri +1w> DEADLINE: <2010-09-26 Sun ++1w>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Other combinations also work as expected:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* TODO Another example
SCHEDULED: <2010-09-17 Fri .+1w> DEADLINE: <2010-09-19 Sun .+1w>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
becomes...
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* TODO Another example
SCHEDULED: <2010-09-24 Fri .+1w> DEADLINE: <2010-09-24 Fri .+1w>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Best,
Matt
- [Orgmode] Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans], Andrew J. Korty, 2010/09/15
- [Orgmode] Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans], Bernt Hansen, 2010/09/16
- [Orgmode] Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans], Andrew J. Korty, 2010/09/16
- [Orgmode] Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans], Andrew J. Korty, 2010/09/16
- [Orgmode] Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans], Matt Lundin, 2010/09/17
- [Orgmode] Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans], Andrew J. Korty, 2010/09/17
- [Orgmode] Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans], Matt Lundin, 2010/09/17
- [Orgmode] Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans], Andrew J. Korty, 2010/09/17
- [Orgmode] Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans], Matt Lundin, 2010/09/17
- [Orgmode] Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans], Andrew J. Korty, 2010/09/18
[Orgmode] Re: Bug: org-auto-repeat-maybe only updates first timestamp [7.01trans],
Matt Lundin <=