[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] org-html link building diff
From: |
Sebastian Rose |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] org-html link building diff |
Date: |
Tue, 18 May 2010 14:26:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:
> On May 18, 2010, at 2:59 AM, Tom Breton (Tehom) wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi, Carsten. The new changes are pushed as
>> tehom-html-export-refactor-build-link
>>
>> I couldn't undo the basing onto tehom-master, try though I might.
>> Something to do with intermediate changes that I couldn't fast-forward
>> and that I probably edited wrong. So I made a separate branch,
>> tehom-html-export-refactor-build-link, which is now pushed to the
>> repo. So tehom-master and html-export-refactor-build-link are already
>> obsolete.
>>
>> I moved the tests into top-level directory testing, as you asked. I'm
>> going to write a separate post describing the test conventions I use.
>>
>> Now a question: IIUC you want a branch that has no tests, that
>> "contains only the changes that would go into org". Since I develop
>> tests and code at about the same time (tests slightly before code),
>> I'm not sure how to arrange the branching in a maintainable way.
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> If we decide to use your emtests framework for Org on a brader basis, then
> there
> would be no reason to have a branch free of tests. This is only necessary
> because I am supposed to apply your patches, but without the testing
> framework
> at the moment.
>
> Maybe we should just go ahead and start using emtest for Org-mode. Why don't
> you go ahead and propose this in a mail to emacs-orgmode. Lets see if there
> is
> any resistance by people who understand more about testing than I do. If
> not,
> we go ahead and do it.
We had that discussion here aleady, and the result is: we have no test
framework to work with.
Better just do it ;)
Sebastian
- Re: [Orgmode] org-html link building diff, Carsten Dominik, 2010/05/01
- Re: [Orgmode] org-html link building diff, Carsten Dominik, 2010/05/16
- [Orgmode] Test-file naming conventions - mine and suggested for org, Tom Breton (Tehom), 2010/05/17
- [Orgmode] Re: Test-file naming conventions - mine and suggested for org, Carsten Dominik, 2010/05/21
- [Orgmode] Proposal: Emtest as tester, Tom Breton (Tehom), 2010/05/24
- [Orgmode] Re: Proposal: Emtest as tester, Dan Davison, 2010/05/24
- [Orgmode] Re: Proposal: Emtest as tester, Tom Breton (Tehom), 2010/05/27
- [Orgmode] Re: Proposal: Emtest as tester, Carsten Dominik, 2010/05/25
- Re: [Orgmode] Proposal: Emtest as tester, Martin Pohlack, 2010/05/25
- Re: [Orgmode] Proposal: Emtest as tester, Tom Breton (Tehom), 2010/05/27