[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Orgmode] Re: org-mode tutorial questionaire
From: |
Alexander Poslavsky |
Subject: |
[Orgmode] Re: org-mode tutorial questionaire |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:30:11 +0100 |
On Mar 24, 2010, at 12:46 AM, Matt Lundin wrote:
<snip>
>
> Sorry if my question was unclear. I'm simply wondering whether we should
> recommend a multi-step process to new users (i.e., C-x b to create a new
> buffer and then C-x C-s to activate org-mode) when C-x C-f (find-file)
> both creates a new buffer and activates org-mode immediately. Of course,
> all this is a matter of taste (as is almost everything in emacs)! But I
> suspect a new user might find it a bit crufty if org-mode commands don't
> work *until* the buffer is first saved. Also, C-x b (switch-to-buffer)
> followed by C-x s typically requires you to provide two names (first the
> buffer and then the file), whereas C-x C-f does everything at once.
<snip>
You are probably right, leaving out C-x b, will make it just a bit simpler,
thanks,
alex
[Orgmode] Re: org-mode tutorial questionaire, Richard Riley, 2010/03/23
- [Orgmode] Re: org-mode tutorial questionaire, Bernt Hansen, 2010/03/23
- [Orgmode] Re: org-mode tutorial questionaire, Richard Riley, 2010/03/24
- [Orgmode] Re: org-mode tutorial questionaire, Bernt Hansen, 2010/03/24
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: org-mode tutorial questionaire, Ian Barton, 2010/03/24
- [Orgmode] Re: org-mode tutorial questionaire, Austin Frank, 2010/03/25
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: org-mode tutorial questionaire, Ian Barton, 2010/03/27