[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails t
From: |
Carsten Dominik |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions |
Date: |
Tue, 25 Sep 2007 09:07:05 -0700 |
On Sep 25, 2007, at 7:05, Georg C. F. Greve wrote:
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:52:44 +0200
Bastien <address@hidden> wrote:
b> You can also set `org-remember-default-headline'. In your case,
b> maybe "Emails" is a good choice:
b> (setq org-remember-default-headline "Emails")
Yes, this seems useful.
b> Then you have to make sure there is a headline containing "Emails"
b> in your `org-default-notes-file' or in the file the template is
b> pointing to.
What would happen if there were no such headline? Would it be created?
Not so far, but this is a good idea, I will implement this.
(setq org-remember-templates
'((?e "* NEXT %?\n %i\n %a" "Email" "Emails")))
b> ^^^^^
b> So I would suggest this configuration:
I tried that.
When typing "C-c C-c" it asks for a filename to save into (instead of
saving into the default, as the menu claims)
??? Which version do you have?
This depends on the variable `org-remember-store-without-prompt' and
works fine with the current version.
and when trying to specify
the existing file, I get
"File `/home/greve/Tools/Org/Email' exists; overwrite? (y or n)"
which I declined as I don't want to lose that file.
??? I have never seen that. Anyone?
If I do "C-c C-c" and give it "~/.notes" by hand (which should not have
been necessary in the first place) I get the following result for
.notes, regardless of its previous state:
## Filing location: Select interactively, default, or last used:
## C-u C-c C-c to select file and header location interactively.
## C-c C-c "~/.notes" -> "* "
## C-u C-u C-c C-c "???" -> "* ???"
## To switch templates, use `M-x org-remember'.
* NEXT This is a test for an email
[[mairix:m:address@hidden
from Adam Spiers: Re: Orgmode GTD: Solving the]]
So it seems that remember/org is malfunctioning somehow.
Again, I have never seen this.
hmmm, we had a thread recently where someone was complain that the
comments were not
removed. Does anyone remember was the reason was?
- Carsten
- [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Georg C. F. Greve, 2007/09/24
- Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, John Wiegley, 2007/09/24
- Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Georg C. F. Greve, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Bastien, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Georg C. F. Greve, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Bastien, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Georg C. F. Greve, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Bastien, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Carsten Dominik, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Georg C. F. Greve, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions,
Carsten Dominik <=
- [Orgmode] Re: GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Nuutti Kotivuori, 2007/09/25
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Carsten Dominik, 2007/09/25
Re: [Orgmode] GTD: Solving the bottleneck of converting incoming mails to NEXT actions, Adam Spiers, 2007/09/24