emacs-diffs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-diffs] trunk r114184: Restore portions of my comment, which I fou


From: Glenn Morris
Subject: [Emacs-diffs] trunk r114184: Restore portions of my comment, which I found less clear after copyedits
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 18:14:55 +0000
User-agent: Bazaar (2.6b2)

------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 114184
revision-id: address@hidden
parent: address@hidden
committer: Glenn Morris <address@hidden>
branch nick: trunk
timestamp: Mon 2013-09-09 14:14:50 -0400
message:
  Restore portions of my comment, which I found less clear after copyedits
modified:
  configure.ac                   
configure.in-20091113204419-o5vbwnq5f7feedwu-783
=== modified file 'configure.ac'
--- a/configure.ac      2013-09-09 16:26:38 +0000
+++ b/configure.ac      2013-09-09 18:14:50 +0000
@@ -1026,10 +1026,13 @@
 dnl Treat GCC specially since it just gives a non-fatal `unrecognized option'
 dnl if not built to support GNU ld.
 
-dnl Adding -znocombreloc to LDFLAGS rather than LD_SWITCH_SYSTEM_TEMACS is:
-dnl * inappropriate, as LDFLAGS is a build option but this is essential.  See:
+dnl For a long time, -znocombreloc was added to LDFLAGS rather than
+dnl LD_SWITCH_SYSTEM_TEMACS.  That is:
+dnl * inappropriate, as LDFLAGS is a user option but this is essential.
+dnl   Eg "make LDFLAGS=... all" could run into problems,
 dnl   http://bugs.debian.org/684788
-dnl * unnecessary, since temacs is the only thing that actually needs it.  See:
+dnl * unnecessary, since temacs is the only thing that actually needs it.
+dnl   Indeed this is where it was originally, prior to:
 dnl   http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-pretest-bug/2004-03/msg00170.html
 late_LDFLAGS="$LDFLAGS"
 if test x$GCC = xyes; then


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]