emacs-diffs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r110714: * cl.texi (Setf Extensions):


From: Glenn Morris
Subject: [Emacs-diffs] /srv/bzr/emacs/trunk r110714: * cl.texi (Setf Extensions): Remove `apply' setf since it seems to be disabled.
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 18:19:26 -0700
User-agent: Bazaar (2.5.0)

------------------------------------------------------------
revno: 110714
committer: Glenn Morris <address@hidden>
branch nick: trunk
timestamp: Sun 2012-10-28 18:19:26 -0700
message:
  * cl.texi (Setf Extensions): Remove `apply' setf since it seems to be 
disabled.
modified:
  doc/misc/ChangeLog
  doc/misc/cl.texi
=== modified file 'doc/misc/ChangeLog'
--- a/doc/misc/ChangeLog        2012-10-29 01:06:13 +0000
+++ b/doc/misc/ChangeLog        2012-10-29 01:19:26 +0000
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
 2012-10-29  Glenn Morris  <address@hidden>
 
        * cl.texi (Organization): More details on cl-lib.el versus cl.el.
+       (Setf Extensions): Remove `apply' setf since it seems to be disabled.
 
 2012-10-28  Glenn Morris  <address@hidden>
 

=== modified file 'doc/misc/cl.texi'
--- a/doc/misc/cl.texi  2012-10-29 01:14:50 +0000
+++ b/doc/misc/cl.texi  2012-10-29 01:19:26 +0000
@@ -964,6 +964,8 @@
 
 @c FIXME? Also `eq'? (see cl-lib.el)
 
address@hidden Currently commented out in cl.el.
address@hidden
 @item
 A call of the form @code{(apply '@var{func} @dots{})} or
 @code{(apply (function @var{func}) @dots{})}, where @var{func}
@@ -972,6 +974,7 @@
 Emacs place functions are suitable in this sense, this feature is
 only interesting when used with places you define yourself with
 @code{define-setf-method} or the long form of @code{defsetf}.
address@hidden ignore
 
 @item
 A macro call, in which case the macro is expanded and @code{setf}
@@ -979,7 +982,7 @@
 
 @item
 Any form for which a @code{defsetf} or @code{define-setf-method}
-has been made.
+has been made.  @xref{Obsolete Setf Customization}.
 @end itemize
 
 @c FIXME should this be in lispref?  It seems self-evident.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]