emacs-diffs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL,v [EMACS_22_BASE]


From: Eli Zaretskii
Subject: [Emacs-diffs] Changes to emacs/nt/INSTALL,v [EMACS_22_BASE]
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 13:38:17 +0000

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/emacs
Module name:    emacs
Branch:         EMACS_22_BASE
Changes by:     Eli Zaretskii <eliz>    07/05/04 13:38:16

Index: INSTALL
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/nt/INSTALL,v
retrieving revision 1.50
retrieving revision 1.50.2.1
diff -u -b -r1.50 -r1.50.2.1
--- INSTALL     31 Mar 2007 10:40:19 -0000      1.50
+++ INSTALL     4 May 2007 13:38:16 -0000       1.50.2.1
@@ -157,11 +157,11 @@
     cygwin compiled gmake 3.77:          fails[1, 5]   fails[2, 5]
     cygwin compiled make 3.78.1:         fails[5]      fails[2, 5]
     cygwin compiled make 3.79.1:         fails[3, 5]   fails[2?, 5]
-    cygwin compiled make 3.80:           fails?[6]     fails?[6]
-    cygwin compiled make 3.81:           fails         fails?[6]
+    cygwin compiled make 3.80:           okay[6]       fails?[7]
+    cygwin compiled make 3.81:           fails         fails?[7]
     mingw32 compiled make 3.79.1:        okay          okay
-    mingw32 compiled make 3.80:          okay          okay[6]
-    mingw32 compiled make 3.81:          okay          okay[7]
+    mingw32 compiled make 3.80:          okay          okay[7]
+    mingw32 compiled make 3.81:          okay          okay[8]
 
   Notes:
 
@@ -173,8 +173,10 @@
     [4] may fail on Windows 9X and Windows ME; if so, install Bash.
     [5] fails when building leim due to the use of cygwin style paths.
         May work if building emacs without leim.
-    [6] not recommended; please report if you try this combination.
-    [7] tested only on Windows XP.
+    [6] need to uncomment 3 lines in nt/gmake.defs that invoke `cygpath'
+       (look for "cygpath" near line 85 of gmake.defs).
+    [7] not recommended; please report if you try this combination.
+    [8] tested only on Windows XP.
 
   Other compilers may work, but specific reports from people that have
   tried suggest that the Intel C compiler (for example) may produce an




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]