Re: Future release of emacs-26

[Stefan Monnier]

>> > The signature checking has never worked anyway, though.
>> Maybe not for you, but it's supposed to work, and AFAIK it works for
>> many people.
> Oh, sorry. I always assumed this was why package-check-signatures defaulted
> to allow-unsigned.

No, this setting is to make it easier for the other ELPA archives which
(AFAIK) don't sign their packages (and in any case, Emacs doesn't come
with the keys for those).

> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=35739

Thanks,


        Stefan