[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Most of Elisp lacks lexical-binding: t
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: Most of Elisp lacks lexical-binding: t |
|
Date: |
Tue, 05 Feb 2019 05:31:59 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2019 16:54:04 -0500
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> > The question is, though, at what point does it become the default?
>
> IIUC Eli is not in a hurry to see it become the default.
I don't see how we could make this the default before we complete
converting all the Lisp files to lexical binding (or, unlikely, decide
that some of them need to use dynamic binding). It would mean risking
a lot of breakage.
- Most of Elisp lacks lexical-binding: t, Simon Reiser, 2019/02/02
- Re: Most of Elisp lacks lexical-binding: t, Alan Mackenzie, 2019/02/02
- Re: Most of Elisp lacks lexical-binding: t, Stefan Monnier, 2019/02/03
- Re: Most of Elisp lacks lexical-binding: t, T.V Raman, 2019/02/03
- Re: Most of Elisp lacks lexical-binding: t, Phillip Lord, 2019/02/04
- Re: Most of Elisp lacks lexical-binding: t, Stefan Monnier, 2019/02/04
- Re: Most of Elisp lacks lexical-binding: t,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Most of Elisp lacks lexical-binding: t, Phil Sainty, 2019/02/05
- Re: Most of Elisp lacks lexical-binding: t, Stefan Monnier, 2019/02/05
- Re: Most of Elisp lacks lexical-binding: t, Phillip Lord, 2019/02/06
- Re: Most of Elisp lacks lexical-binding: t, Stefan Monnier, 2019/02/06
- Re: Most of Elisp lacks lexical-binding: t, Paul Eggert, 2019/02/07
- Re: Most of Elisp lacks lexical-binding: t, Stefan Monnier, 2019/02/07
- Re: Most of Elisp lacks lexical-binding: t, Stefan Monnier, 2019/02/05
- Re: Most of Elisp lacks lexical-binding: t, Richard Stallman, 2019/02/06
- Re: Most of Elisp lacks lexical-binding: t, Stefan Monnier, 2019/02/06