Re: bidi, hebrew: files may need to be utf-8 with a byte order mark

[Uwe Brauer]

>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:

   >> From: Uwe Brauer <address@hidden>
   >> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 18:13:30 +0100
   >> 
   >> I am trying to contribute to the keyman project and provide a phonetic
   >> hebrew keyboard layout. It was pointed out to me by the maintainers,
   >> that I should use 
   >> 
   >> ,----
   >> | One issue is that some of the files may need to be utf-8 with a byte
   >> | order mark. I would suggest using Visual Studio Code as the editor. It
   >> | will reduce grief on Mac OS or Linux.
   >> `----
   >> 
   >> I would like to know whether GNU emacs (master) satisfies these
   >> requirements. I am pretty sure it does, but would like to get a
   >> confirmation, best by Eli.

   > I don't think I understand the question.  If you ask whether Emacs
   > supports UTF-8 encoding with BOM, then the answer is yes: see
   > coding-system utf-8-with-signature.  Emacs has supported this since
   > long ago, not just on master.  But this has no direct relation to
   > bidi.

Well I just included the remark from the keyman project. So BOM means
byte order mark, I presume and as I understand GNU emacs supports it. 

I recall some time ago some specific issue of the hebrew or better bidi
implementation, like some missing feature which was only included
recently (by this I mean ~25 or later. I call it recently since Ubuntu
still ships officially GNU emacs 24).

I also thought that BOM is related to bidi, but since I have no much
idea about the implantation, I see that I was wrong. 

Thanks for the answer.

BTW is that a BOM ‏?
(insert-char 8207 1 t)

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature