[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#28691: [PATCH] Add file name handler support for 'make-process'
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: bug#28691: [PATCH] Add file name handler support for 'make-process' (Bug#28691) |
|
Date: |
Mon, 17 Dec 2018 22:01:50 +0200 |
> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2018 14:57:04 -0500
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> >> "Remote" is just one possibility. It can also be local under
> >> a different UID, or it could be local in a virtual machine, ...
> > The current implementation regards both cases also as "remote", provided
> > by Tramp. file-remote-p returns non-nil.
> > It might be unfortune, but I don't recommend to change the function's name.
>
> I'm not suggesting to rename that function, but I think we should try and
> keep this as an exception rather than start using the word "remote"
> always meaning "as defined by file-remote-p" rather than the more
> common meaning.
I think you can trust me to understand all that. I used "remote" to
make my point more clear, expressed with simpler wording, that's all.