Re: Replace trivial pcase occurrences in the Emacs sources

[Dmitry Gutov]

On 31.10.2018 17:50, Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> > > > > Couldn't we also say that a pattern with "holes" is a destructuring pattern,
> > > > > not matter if it is used in pcase-let, or just pcase?
> > > > We could, but the reason why I'm trying to define a new term (which
> > > > I called here "destructuring pattern") is to define what happens with
> > > > pcase-let, pcase-dolist, pcase-let* where the pattern is assumed
> > > > to match.
> > > I only meant to say that introducing a term that somebody fairly familiar
> > > with the subject might misinterpret without reading its definition in the
> > > manual, could be suboptimal.
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > > But don't mind me, I don't have any alternative proposals anyway.
> >
> > Neither do I,
>
> Can someone enlighten me regarding those "holes"?  What does that
> allude to?

I stole the term from Clement here: 
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2018-10/msg00590.html