Naming predicates (was: master d0c77a1: Remove some assumptions about timestamp format)

[Stefan Monnier]

>> Shouldn't this be `time-equal-p', as we have already `time-less-p'?
> Thanks, as a Scheme refugee I never can remember which predicates should end
> in "-p" vs "p" vs nothing. I installed the attached.

The rule is not that bad: use a "-p or p" suffix whenever a Schemer
would use a "?" suffix.  As for when to use "-p" vs just "p" I'd say you
can simply always use "-p" when it's something you define.


        Stefan "who likes Scheme's ?, ->, and ! naming conventions"