Re: while-no-input interrupted by *shell*

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Stefan Monnier <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:40:39 -0400
> 
> This said, the bulk of my answer isn't affected: sit-for shouldn't be
> interrupted by subprocess output either, I think.

Really?  I think sit-for is expected to stop waiting when we read
something from a subprocess; sleep-for makes a point of restarting the
wait when that happens.