[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems |
Date: |
Fri, 07 Sep 2018 21:32:31 +0300 |
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 11:13:49 -0700
>
> There are differences in GCC struct layout between MS-Windows and
> GNU/Linux; see the GCC option -mms-bitfields.
"-mms-bitfields" is about something very different, and specifically
for compatibility with Microsoft compilers. I don't see how that
could affect long long.
- Re: GDB and compiler-operations, (continued)
- Re: GDB and compiler-operations, Andreas Schwab, 2018/09/07
- Re: GDB and compiler-operations (was: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems), Paul Eggert, 2018/09/07
- Re: GDB and compiler-operations, Stefan Monnier, 2018/09/07
- Re: GDB and compiler-operations, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/09/07
- Re: GDB and compiler-operations, Paul Eggert, 2018/09/07
- Re: GDB and compiler-operations, Tom Tromey, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Paul Eggert, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Paul Eggert, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Paul Eggert, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Stefan Monnier, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Paul Eggert, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Stefan Monnier, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Paul Eggert, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Stefan Monnier, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Paul Eggert, 2018/09/07
- Re: Lisp_Marker size on 32bit systems, Stefan Monnier, 2018/09/07