|
From: | Noam Postavsky |
Subject: | Re: Proposing "alist" macro |
Date: | Wed, 5 Sep 2018 09:06:25 -0400 |
On 5 September 2018 at 08:41, Van L <address@hidden> wrote: > >> LGTM, but couldn't it be a function? > > A macro does not needlessly eval the args. The proposed macro expansions do eval all the args.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |