[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p?
|
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
|
Subject: |
Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 30 Aug 2018 16:52:13 +0300 |
> From: Michael Albinus <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
> Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 15:37:14 +0200
>
> > It's fine with me to rename, but since we already released Emacs 26.1
> > with this API, we will need to leave behind an obsolete alias.
>
> Will do. For the emacs-26 branch, or master? I'd prefer the former, in
> order not to see too much code in the wild with the obsolete name.
It could go to emacs-26, but there we should not announce
thread-alive-p obsolete yet, it should be obsoleted on master, I
think.