Re: thread-alive-p ? Why not thread-live-p?

[Michael Albinus]

"John Wiegley" <address@hidden> writes:

>>>>>> "TT" == Tom Tromey <address@hidden> writes:
>
> TT> There are a few *-alive-p functions as well. I think if I had thought of
> TT> it I would have chosen thread-live-p though.

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(let ((completion-regexp-list '("-alive-p$"))) (all-completions "" obarray))
=> ("gnus-alive-p" "thread-alive-p" "mm-keep-viewer-alive-p")

(let ((completion-regexp-list '("-live-p$"))) (all-completions "" obarray))
=> ("process-live-p" "window-live-p" "ediff-buffer-live-p" "gnus-buffer-live-p" 
"erc-server-buffer-live-p" "frame-live-p" "buffer-live-p" "dframe-live-p" 
"terminal-live-p")
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

> I do prefer live-p, but I'm not bothered-p either.

If nobody objects next days, I'll change the name. It's not too late, I
believe.

Best regards, Michael.