[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Merging bignum to master
|
From: |
Pip Cet |
|
Subject: |
Re: Merging bignum to master |
|
Date: |
Tue, 14 Aug 2018 13:04:43 +0000 |
Is it intentional that int-forwarded variables are still limited to
the fixnum range? In any case, we probably didn't want to rename
XINTFWD to XFIXNUMFWD...
0001-fix-minor-oversights-in-the-bignum-patch.patch
Description: Text Data
- Re: Merging bignum to master, (continued)
Re: Merging bignum to master, John Wiegley, 2018/08/12
Re: Merging bignum to master, Pip Cet, 2018/08/12
- Re: Merging bignum to master, Tom Tromey, 2018/08/12
- Re: Merging bignum to master, Paul Eggert, 2018/08/13
- Re: Merging bignum to master, Noam Postavsky, 2018/08/13
- Re: Merging bignum to master,
Pip Cet <=
- Re: Merging bignum to master, Paul Eggert, 2018/08/14
- Re: Merging bignum to master, Pip Cet, 2018/08/15
- Re: Merging bignum to master, Paul Eggert, 2018/08/15
- Re: Merging bignum to master, Andy Moreton, 2018/08/15
- Re: Merging bignum to master, Stefan Monnier, 2018/08/16
Some vars now limited to fixnum size. (Was: Merging bignum to master), Karl Fogel, 2018/08/20
Re: Some vars now limited to fixnum size. (Was: Merging bignum to master), Paul Eggert, 2018/08/20
Re: Some vars now limited to fixnum size. (Was: Merging bignum to master), Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/20
Re: Some vars now limited to fixnum size. (Was: Merging bignum to master), Paul Eggert, 2018/08/20
Re: Some vars now limited to fixnum size. (Was: Merging bignum to master), Eli Zaretskii, 2018/08/20