[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum
|
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
|
Subject: |
Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum |
|
Date: |
Tue, 24 Jul 2018 14:14:46 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) |
On Jul 23 2018, Andy Moreton <address@hidden> wrote:
> Also, if the width is specified as 8 I expect to see 8 digits of output,
> not 6.
The width specifies the field width, not the number of digits.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely different."
- Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum, (continued)
- Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum, Stefan Monnier, 2018/07/21
- Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/21
- Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum, Stefan Monnier, 2018/07/21
- Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum, Helmut Eller, 2018/07/21
- Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/21
- Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum, Andy Moreton, 2018/07/23
- Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/23
- Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum, Andy Moreton, 2018/07/23
- Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum, Andy Moreton, 2018/07/24
Re: integer overflow handling for most-negative-fixnum, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/21