[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The netsec thread
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: The netsec thread |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Jul 2018 15:24:04 +0300 |
> From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2018 13:33:03 +0200
> Cc: Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong <address@hidden>
>
> I like the underlining, indentation and *bullet points, but it's looking
> like it's moving more in the direction of a TLS debugging buffer than
> something that a user has much chance of understanding or navigating.
> (The old one also has that problem, but to a lesser degree.)
>
> For instance, displaying the full x.50x/RFC4514 string is a turn-off and
> looks like line noise to most people, I think. Breaking out the three
> bits that are of interest, the CN from the issuer, the O from the
> recipient, and the host name, is more readable. (Not to mention that
> the strings are usually too long and will wrap on common
> configurations.)
Would it make sense to have a button "More details" there, which would
then display these details?
- The netsec thread, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/07/20
- Re: The netsec thread,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: The netsec thread, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/07/20
- Re: The netsec thread, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/07/20
- Re: The netsec thread, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/20
- Re: The netsec thread, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/07/20
- Re: The netsec thread, Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong, 2018/07/22
- Re: The netsec thread, Brett Gilio, 2018/07/22
- Re: The netsec thread, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/22
- Re: The netsec thread, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/07/23
- Re: The netsec thread, Andy Moreton, 2018/07/23
- Re: The netsec thread, Jimmy Yuen Ho Wong, 2018/07/23