[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: regex.c simplification
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: regex.c simplification |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Jul 2018 09:58:12 +0300 |
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:59:12 -0700
>
> No, etags uses the regexp code only for --regex arguments. It would of course
> be
> simpler to disable --regex on platforms lacking the glibc regex API. However,
> my
> impression is that etags --regex gets some use. For example:
>
> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/21283687/what-do-you-put-in-your-standard-etags-regex-calls
> http://xahlee.info/comp/ctags_etags_gtags.html
We actually use the --regex switch in our own Makefile, for the TAGS
target, see src/Makefile.in.
- Re: regex.c simplification, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/17
- Re: regex.c simplification, Stefan Monnier, 2018/07/19
- Re: regex.c simplification, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/19
- Re: regex.c simplification, Stefan Monnier, 2018/07/19
- Re: regex.c simplification, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/20
- Re: regex.c simplification, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/20
- Re: regex.c simplification, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/21
- Re: regex.c simplification, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/21
- Re: regex.c simplification, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/31
- Re: regex.c simplification, Brett Gilio, 2018/07/31
- Re: regex.c simplification,
Eli Zaretskii <=