[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bignum branch
From: |
Clément Pit-Claudel |
Subject: |
Re: bignum branch |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jul 2018 17:17:47 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
On 2018-07-17 16:00, Robert Pluim wrote:>> Or maybe we should have a variant of
'ash' that does truncate, since>> other callers might expect the same?>
> It an obvious assumption to make in a system that only has
> fixnums. The issue is probably not confined to 'ash'.
I wonder if a file- or dir-local variable to tell the interpreter and the
byte-compiler whether to use fixnums would make sense. It would be akin to
lexical-binding: t.
- Re: bignum branch, (continued)
- Re: bignum branch, Tom Tromey, 2018/07/13
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/13
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/13
- Re: bignum branch, Robert Pluim, 2018/07/13
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/13
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/07/15
- Re: bignum branch, Robert Pluim, 2018/07/17
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/17
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/17
- Re: bignum branch, Robert Pluim, 2018/07/17
- Re: bignum branch,
Clément Pit-Claudel <=
- Re: bignum branch, Stefan Monnier, 2018/07/17
- Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/07/18
- Re: bignum branch, Robert Pluim, 2018/07/18
- Re: bignum branch, Stefan Monnier, 2018/07/18
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/18
- Re: bignum branch, Robert Pluim, 2018/07/18
- Re: bignum branch, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/18
- Re: bignum branch, Robert Pluim, 2018/07/13
Re: bignum branch, Andy Moreton, 2018/07/13