[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Use of "Action stamps" in commit messages
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Use of "Action stamps" in commit messages |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Jul 2018 18:05:23 +0300 |
> From: Andy Moreton <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 16:01:28 +0100
>
> >> Fixes: 1222ff5275 ("Don't skip epg-tests even with gpg 2.0 (Bug#23561)")
> >
> > We wanted an ID that is not specific to Git, having learned that a
> > hard way from the period we used bzr revision numbers.
>
> Using the summary line of the commit message is still useful to help
> identify the right changeset (as long as you train popel to stop writing
> bad commit messages like "fix last commit").
Yes, but adding a date makes the reference more precise.
> > They will stop being useful if we ever change our VCS.
>
> That is unlikely for the forseeable future.
Yes, we thought that way, too, in the past. We were wrong.
- Use of "Action stamps" in commit messages (WAS: [Emacs-diffs] master babe0d4: Rearrange definition of zerop in subr.el), Noam Postavsky, 2018/07/13
- Re: Use of "Action stamps" in commit messages (WAS: [Emacs-diffs] master babe0d4: Rearrange definition of zerop in subr.el), Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/13
- Re: Use of "Action stamps" in commit messages, Andy Moreton, 2018/07/13
- Re: Use of "Action stamps" in commit messages, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/13
- Re: Use of "Action stamps" in commit messages, Radon Rosborough, 2018/07/13
- Re: Use of "Action stamps" in commit messages, Yuri Khan, 2018/07/13
- Re: Use of "Action stamps" in commit messages, Radon Rosborough, 2018/07/13
- Re: Use of "Action stamps" in commit messages, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/13
- Re: Use of "Action stamps" in commit messages, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/13
- Re: Use of "Action stamps" in commit messages, John Yates, 2018/07/13
- Re: Use of "Action stamps" in commit messages, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/07/13
Re: Use of "Action stamps" in commit messages, Paul Eggert, 2018/07/13