[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: regex.c simplification
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: regex.c simplification |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Jun 2018 19:55:42 +0300 |
> Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2018 09:42:37 -0700
> From: "Daniel Colascione" <address@hidden>
> Cc: Daniel Colascione <address@hidden>, address@hidden
>
> > The emacs regex code is hardly state of the art. I would suggest that
> > there are many other, better, free software implementations of
> > regexes.
>
> There are. Unfortunately, none of them understand predicates like \= and \s|.
Right. And there are a few more features important to Emacs that
other implementations don't support.
So, while I think modernizing our regex code would be a welcome
development, we shouldn't mislead ourselves into thinking that any
other implementation could be a drop-in replacement. Some work will
be needed to add the features we expect.
Re: regex.c simplification, Daniel Colascione, 2018/06/16
Re: regex.c simplification, Noam Postavsky, 2018/06/16
Re: regex.c simplification, Perry E. Metzger, 2018/06/16
- Re: regex.c simplification, Daniel Colascione, 2018/06/16
- Re: regex.c simplification,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: regex.c simplification, Perry E. Metzger, 2018/06/16
- Re: regex.c simplification, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/06/16
- Re: regex.c simplification, Perry E. Metzger, 2018/06/16
- Re: regex.c simplification, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/06/16
- Re: regex.c simplification, Robert Pluim, 2018/06/18