[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Predicate for true lists
From: |
Basil L. Contovounesios |
Subject: |
Re: Predicate for true lists |
Date: |
Mon, 04 Jun 2018 13:12:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
0001-Add-predicate-list-true-p.patch
Description: Add predicate 'list-true-p'
bench.el
Description: Benchmark for 'list-true-p'
"Basil L. Contovounesios" <address@hidden> writes:
> A while ago, I added a little convenience function to my init file[1]
> to determine whether a given object is a true list (as opposed to a
> circular or dotted one):
>
> (null (nthcdr (safe-length object) object))
>
> [1]:
> https://github.com/basil-conto/dotfiles/blob/96aeb904a6fd94d9fbcf95483fd4f79194e90592/.emacs.d/lisp/blc-lib.el#L46-L49
>
> Since then, I have noticed variations of this predicate/condition strewn
> around the Emacs sources, albeit usually implemented less efficiently.
>
> Would such a predicate be a welcome addition to, say, subr.el or
> subr-x.el? I attach a first draft of a patch targeting subr.el for your
> consideration.
>
> Also attached is a toy benchmark comparing the new function list-true-p
> with the existing format-proper-list-p and ert--proper-list-p when
> given, in turn, a true, dotted, and circular list as argument.
> It prints the following, after a couple of runs:
>
> ‘format-proper-list-p’
> true (0.16966186900000002 0 0.0)
> dotted (0.168859839 0 0.0)
> circular (0.244791363 0 0.0)
> ‘ert--proper-list-p’
> true (0.622797443 0 0.0)
> dotted (0.621622385 0 0.0)
> circular (0.9150398590000001 0 0.0)
> ‘list-true-p’
> true (0.042970005000000006 0 0.0)
> dotted (0.04294060500000001 0 0.0)
> circular (0.057346661 0 0.0)
>
> P.S. What is the preferred way of formatting car/cdr in docstrings?
> The manuals seem to use small caps CAR/CDR and subr.el seems to
> alternate between no quotes and `car'/`cdr'. I have gone with the
> latter for the docstring of list-true-p, at least for now.
Any interest in or comments on this proposal?
Should I submit a wishlist bug report for this instead?
Thanks,
--
Basil
- Re: Predicate for true lists,
Basil L. Contovounesios <=
Re: Predicate for true lists, Paul Eggert, 2018/06/04