Re: rx.el sexp regexp syntax

[Eric Abrahamsen]

Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:

>> I played around with this, but it might not be possible to achieve
>> enough of the conveniences to make it worthwhile.
>
> I think we'd need to extend the reader to provide a specialized syntax,
> which in turns means changing elisp-mode, etc...
> I think it's a fairly large amount of work, for fairly little benefit in
> the end compared to what we can get today.

Yup. Oh well, it was a beautiful dream.