Re: rx.el sexp regexp syntax

[Robert Pluim]

João Távora <address@hidden> writes:

> Drew Adams <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Given such functions, I might use RX and the show-me-the-regexp
>> function to create a regexp string, which I'd leave in the code,
>> and I might use the show-me-the-RX function when I need to change
>> such a string (or think about it).
>
> +1, FWIW. But are there such functions? </delurk>

rx->regexp obviously exists, but Iʼm not aware of the reverse. Thank
you for volunteering! ;-)

Robert