Re: Finding macro-generated ert test definitions

[Noam Postavsky]

On 24 May 2018 at 12:50, João Távora <address@hidden> wrote:

> Nothing against this, but can anyone comment on the possiblity of
> recording actual position information in bytecomp.el, so we wouldn't
> have this limitation in the first place (and hence wouldn't need to
> document it)?

Considering Bug#24592, it seems a bit optimistic to expect useful
position information from the byte compiler.

I think Michael's suggesting about `definition-name' could help. That
seems like something that should be mentioned in the elisp manual too,
somewhere.

https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2018-05/msg00628.html