[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME? |
Date: |
Tue, 15 May 2018 22:52:38 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
If you allow a mail user agent to render HTML for you, you expose
yourself to various kinds of surveillance and swindles. Now, it seems,
one of those might be a decryption exploit.
Does the exploit depend on Javascript code that the MUI will execute?
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (https://gnu.org, https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See https://stallman.org/skype.html.
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, (continued)
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/05/15
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Uwe Brauer, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Uwe Brauer, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Lars Ingebrigtsen, 2018/05/16
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?,
Richard Stallman <=
Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Andreas Schwab, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Eli Zaretskii, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Andreas Schwab, 2018/05/16
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Richard Stallman, 2018/05/17
- Re: Emacs/Mutt and Efail or OpenPGP is safer than S/MIME?, Uwe Brauer, 2018/05/18