[SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: [PATCH] * etc/NEWS: Document incompatibilities introduced by record types.

[Stefan Monnier]

>> Hello?  We've been through this discussion enough times, I believe.
>> I'm absolutely firmly completely totally opposed to such a check in
>> `make-record`.
> The change I want is in the constructs that define record types,
> which I think is not 'make-record'.

Such a check is in a patch posted earlier.

> Does `make-record' check that the specified record type is defined?

No, `make-record` doesn't even really know what is a type.


        Stefan