Re: A generalization of `thunk-let'

[Michael Heerdegen]

Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:

> Why design this to work on let bindings rather than on top-level
> buffer-local bindings?  Wouldn't the latter be most convenient for
> this sort of thing?

If I understand your question correctly: there is no such restriction -
the code looks at the bindings of the as dependency declared variables -
these don't have to be let-bindings.


Michael.