[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sandbox subr-x? (was: `thunk-let'?)
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Sandbox subr-x? (was: `thunk-let'?) |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Nov 2017 09:57:02 +0200 |
> From: Michael Heerdegen <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 00:07:45 +0100
> Cc: Clément Pit-Claudel <address@hidden>,
> address@hidden
>
> But maybe subr-x is also a symptom of limited manpower: if we had hordes
> of people volunteering writing and updating documentation, we would
> probably be less reluctant to fully integrate and document this stuff in
> the first place.
No, I don't think this is the reason. We are lately trying to
accompany every change with the appropriate documentation, and we are
doing quite well, AFAICT, limited manpower notwithstanding.
- Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: `thunk-let'?, (continued)
- Re: [SUSPECTED SPAM] Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/08
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/08
- RE: `thunk-let'?, Drew Adams, 2017/11/08
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
- RE: `thunk-let'?, Drew Adams, 2017/11/09
- Sandbox subr-x? (was: `thunk-let'?), Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
- RE: Sandbox subr-x? (was: `thunk-let'?), Drew Adams, 2017/11/09
- Re: Sandbox subr-x? (was: `thunk-let'?),
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Clément Pit-Claudel, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/10
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/09
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/10
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Michael Heerdegen, 2017/11/11
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/11/11
- Re: `thunk-let'?, Nicolas Petton, 2017/11/10