[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug #29083: Is it OK to add a new function to the emacs-26 branch?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Bug #29083: Is it OK to add a new function to the emacs-26 branch? |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Nov 2017 13:04:26 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>> FWIW, it would be even better to add this command to which-function-mode
>> so it can work in "any" mode.
> which-function-mode is something a little different - it displays the
> current function name continuously in the mode line.
Yes, I understand that. I meant to add such a command to the same file
as which-function-mode and using the same infrastructure.
> Am I right in thinking the meaning of your "to add this command to w-f-m"
> is that
> (i) There would be a command to display the current function name in the
> minibuffer, together with a line offset in it, and the other refinements
> currently in c-display-defun-name.
> (ii) This command would be available regardless of whether or not w-f-m
> is currently enabled.
> ?
Yes.
> If so, I agree this is a good idea. However it would need some key
> sequence in the global map (or we could expect each user to set her own
> C-c <letter> binding for it).
It's not indispensable: those users who want such a feature can bind
their own key to it.
> One disadvantage: this new facility can scarcely be included in Emacs
> 26, as it would be too big a change at this stage.
That's right. But this feature has been missing for so many years, that
delaying it a little bit, in exchange for "doing it right" seems like
a good deal.
> I would probably be prepared to work on this.
That would be wonderful.
Stefan