[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Sep 2017 20:14:30 +0300 |
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 10:07:42 -0700
>
> Although args[0] stops GCC from complaining, it is less useful than UNINIT
> because it will make cleanup more difficult in the future.
I don't see it that way, but these are minor stylistic differences of
opinion that we don't have to agree about.
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, (continued)
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/15
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Fabrice Popineau, 2017/09/15
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/15
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Fabrice Popineau, 2017/09/15
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/16
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Paul Eggert, 2017/09/17
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/17
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Philipp Stephani, 2017/09/17
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Paul Eggert, 2017/09/17
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Paul Eggert, 2017/09/17
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Paul Eggert, 2017/09/17
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/17
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Paul Eggert, 2017/09/17
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/17
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Paul Eggert, 2017/09/18
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/18
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Paul Eggert, 2017/09/18
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Andy Moreton, 2017/09/18
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Paul Eggert, 2017/09/19
- Re: Suspicious warning in W64 build, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/09/18