[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit
From: |
Jean-Christophe Helary |
Subject: |
Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Jul 2017 11:29:33 +0900 |
> On Jul 6, 2017, at 10:46, Glenn Morris <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Clément Pit-Claudel wrote:
>
>> It could mean re-evaluating the legal papers process, instead, to
>> ensure that it can be conducted entirely online. There was a bit of
>> discussion on that topic in the past, and this push to get legal
>> papers for Magit could be a good occasion to revisit it.
>
> Do you not imagine that the FSF appreciates that completing the
> assignment process is an issue for some people, and have already made it
> as simple as the legal system allows?
>
> https://www.fsf.org/blogs/licensing/fsf-to-begin-accepting-gpg-signatures-for-copyright-assignments-from-italy
That was 18 months ago and in the meanwhile I was able to scan a signed
document and send it as a PDF. from Japan. There are still lags in the process,
mostly because some parts don't seem to be automatized.
Jean-Christophe
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit (was: comparing code on different branches), (continued)
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Glenn Morris, 2017/07/05
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Ted Zlatanov, 2017/07/06
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Kaushal Modi, 2017/07/06
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Óscar Fuentes, 2017/07/06
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/06
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Ken Manheimer, 2017/07/06
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Richard Stallman, 2017/07/07
- Re: In support of Jonas Bernoulli's Magit, Stefan Monnier, 2017/07/07