[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
Subject: |
Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ? |
Date: |
Sat, 27 May 2017 06:08:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 0.9.19; emacs 26.0.50 |
On 2017-05-23, at 04:55, Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> wrote:
> Just replace it with 2 different spellings dispatched by the number.
I guess you are aware that 2 different spellings are not enough for
certain languages...?
In Polish:
0 pakietów
1 pakiet
2, 3, 4 pakiety
5, 6, ..., 21 pakietów
22, 23, 24 pakiety
etc.
Good luck with l10n.
(I do not want to discourage work on it. But I'm afraid it's more
difficult than many people think... OTOH, if a reasonable
infrastructure is introduced in Emacs, I might be tempted to provide
some translations for Polish.)
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, (continued)
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Etienne Prud’homme, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Etienne Prud’homme, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Etienne Prud’homme, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/27
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/26
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/27
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?,
Marcin Borkowski <=
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/05/27
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Marcin Borkowski, 2017/05/27
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Göktuğ Kayaalp, 2017/05/27
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/05/27
- Re: Before l10n, better practices for (message) ?, Göktuğ Kayaalp, 2017/05/28