|
From: | Paul Eggert |
Subject: | Re: Failure building Emacs master |
Date: | Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:48:30 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 |
On 03/22/2017 09:10 AM, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
Ah, that wasn't clear from your statement cited above. In <http://bugs.gnu.org/26102#30> I proposed one patch to remove the unencrypted POP3 source code from movemail, and another patch to add --with-movemail. Your statement vetoed the first and changed the second so that --with-movemail was the default. But neither patch made --without-pop the default; that was a third proposal I made later, a proposal that you did not respond to but merely reverted when it was eventually installed.In<http://bugs.gnu.org/26102#39> you asked not to remove the POP source code.Not the POP source code, the fact that we build and install movemail by default.
I'm writing all this because I don't want people to be left with the misimpression that I deliberately installed a patch that you had specifically asked not to be installed. That is not what happened.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |