[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v4] Bound index checks in cl-seq functions
|
From: |
Clément Pit-Claudel |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v4] Bound index checks in cl-seq functions |
|
Date: |
Mon, 6 Feb 2017 02:15:20 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 |
On 2017-02-06 02:00, Tino Calancha wrote:
> Clément Pit-Claudel <address@hidden> writes:
>> On 2017-02-05 02:11, Tino Calancha wrote:
>>> II) `cl--check-bound-indices' returns on success the sequence[s]
>>> length[s], so that callers don't need to recompute them.
>> This sounds like a good idea, performance wise. But maybe it would be
>> even better to disable these checks when (cl-declaim (optimize (safety
>> 0))) is set?
> Yes, that sounds right.
> The new patch disables those checks in that case (safety = 0).
> I got ~0.92 s without checks and ~ 1.10 with checks
> when i ran the following toy:
Great, thanks! :)
Re: [PATCH v4] Bound index checks in cl-seq functions, Tino Calancha, 2017/02/10
Re: [PATCH] Bound index checks in cl-seq functions, Johan Bockgård, 2017/02/12