[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature
|
From: |
John Wiegley |
|
Subject: |
Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature |
|
Date: |
Wed, 01 Feb 2017 22:01:29 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130016 (Ma Gnus v0.16) Emacs/25.1.91 (darwin) |
>>>>> "JB" == Jordon Biondo <address@hidden> writes:
JB> Are maintainers and users still opposed to this change? If not I'd be
JB> happy to update the patch from the previous thread.
I wouldn't mind having them be consistent, if only because it makes it easier
to switch between them, and there is nothing necessary about the
inconsistency. Eli?
--
John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F
http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Tino Calancha, 2017/02/01
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature,
John Wiegley <=
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/02/01
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Jordon Biondo, 2017/02/02
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/02/02
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Jordon Biondo, 2017/02/02
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/02/02
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Jordon Biondo, 2017/02/08
- Re: Revisiting `setq-local`s signature, Eli Zaretskii, 2017/02/10