[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Conservative GC isn't safe
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Conservative GC isn't safe |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Nov 2016 17:55:55 +0200 |
> From: Ken Raeburn <address@hidden>
> Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 04:50:56 -0500
> Cc: address@hidden,
> address@hidden
>
> But if the caller never refers to the object again, it’s certainly possible
> that it wouldn’t keep around any copies of the Lisp_Object value, even in
> other registers, once it’s set up the arguments for the one function call
> that uses the object. If the caller also created the object, there may not
> be any other references left.
One of the callers should still hold the reference.
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, (continued)
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Ken Raeburn, 2016/11/27
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/27
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Ken Raeburn, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Paul Eggert, 2016/11/27
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Ken Raeburn, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Björn Lindqvist, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Stefan Monnier, 2016/11/28
- Re: Conservative GC isn't safe, Ken Raeburn, 2016/11/28